‘Mask mandates are a precautionary principle gone mad’

October 19, 2020

burst

FLAWED STRATEGY: This Chinese manufactured disposable blue mask, regularly used by shoppers and workers alike, and the cloth masks, which have been designed for comfort, are penetrated by particles at almost 97 per cent, twice the rate of medical masks, according to the same Vietnam study. The World Economic Forum says the blue, disposable masks like the one shown here are made from petroleum and are a looming, environmental disaster.

HEALTH RISKS: “The people wearing the cloth-type masks had twice the frequency of symptoms and it was laboratory confirmed. In other words they are probably cooking up nasty cultures on their inadequately washed masks and then inhaling fungi, bacteria what have you, so the objective help says it doesn’t help and might make it worse.” – Dr Mike Yeadon on the 2015 Vietnam study referenced on NCBI site.

 

 

 

A QUALIFIED biochemist and pharmacologist claims the science for mask mandates is fundamentally flawed and forcing the wider public to use cloth masks in public spaces is putting their health at risk.

There was a study on the use of masks in respiratory virus transmission from April 2015 on 1,500 people in and around a group of hospitals in Vietnam and they were studied for a whole season.

The trial referred to above was recorded on the site The National Center For Biological Information, and referenced by Dr Mike Yeadon, former chief scientific advisor to big pharma firm Pfizer, on the You Tube channel Co-Immunity about mask mandates currently being enforced
Some of the “blue” disposable cloth masks currently being used in abundance by many, are made of a plastic derived from petroleum polypropylene.

The World Economic Forum, one of the global supporters of lockdowns, says the astronomical use of these masks is leading to a toxic, global environmental disaster.
.
It was comparing the efficacy of cloth masks to medical masks in hospital healthcare workers (HCWs) and hospital wards were randomized to: medical masks, cloth masks or a control group (usual practice, which included mask wearing). Triallists were using the mask on every shift for four consecutive weeks.

Cloth masks were found to have consistently higher rates of influenza-like illness (ILR) than medical masks in a hospital environment. Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97 per cent, twice as much as medical masks at 44 per cent.

So with the blue disposable masks many use today and the cloth masks used in workplaces or made into fashion items, it begs the question, are they really safe to use?

‘Folks with cloth masks had twice the frequency of symptoms’

“It turns out the people wearing no masks had the same frequency of influenza-like illnesses as the people wearing the high-quality medical masks. The people wearing the cloth-type masks had twice the frequency of symptoms and it was laboratory confirmed.

“In other words they are probably cooking up nasty cultures on their inadequately washed masks and then inhaling fungi, bacteria what have you, so the objective help says it doesn’t help and might make it worse.

‘Viruses can’t function on particles with no mass’

“From a theoretical stand point it is also unlikely – I also worked respiratory drug delivery for decades and it is an incredibly hard thing to do to create an aerosol or particle that they small enough they will be entrained in your inhaled air and not hit your sinuses and the back of your throat, get swallowed and actually flow down to your lungs.

“They have to be really, really small from an aerodynamic perspective, but the problem with that delivery of drugs and infected viruses is that tiny particles carry almost no mass.”

Dr Yeadon asks the listener to recall their O-Level Maths on the relationship between the radius of a sphere and its mass is that tiny particles carry no mass and it is difficult to get a viral load to an airway via inhalation.

‘Why mandate masks after 90% of daily deaths?’

He said: “I’m not surprised it doesn’t work but I was guided by the impirical evidence and the randomized-control trials for me were good enough and I just don’t understand that when we were 90 per cent through the coronavirus death daily deaths of the state curve, we were deep down on the right hand side.

“Why did they then introduce mandatory masks? Because they can. It makes no sense unless because they can.

‘Take off your political glasses and look at Sweden’

“It might be back to the idea that SAGE (Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies) thinks 93 per cent of us are still vulnerable and crikey, Prime Minister, how will you face the public inquiry in the future, lots of people die and you elected not to put in this measure, it won’t do any harm.

“Some people have said it is a control measure, I just think it is precautionary principle gone mad and it arises from SAGE’s misunderstanding completely of where we are in the pandemic, and again I know Sweden is heavily political but just take the politics glasses off for a minute and have a look. “

  • THIS piece is based on the interview between Dr Mike Yeadon and the Co-Immunity Channel and should be viewed and read as such.
  • THE link to the Vietnam study from the NCBI can be seen here.

{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }

Who Am I October 20, 2020 at 5:23 pm

In 10 years everyone that is wearing them today will have severe dementia. I”M NOT CHANGING YOUR DIAPER! In fact, I bet most of will say pffft!

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: