‘MRNA vaccine blocks protein that helps formation of human placenta’

December 10, 2020

NOT JUSTIFIED: “You do not vaccinate people who are not at risk of a disease. You also don’t set about planning to vaccinate millions of fit and healthy people with a vaccine that hasn’t been extensively tested on human subjects.” – Former vice president and chief scientist for allergy and respiratory disease Dr Mike Yeadon.

FERTILITY THREAT: “There is no indication whether antibodies against spike proteins of SARS virus would also act like anti-syncytin-1 antibodies. However, if this were to be the case, this would then also prevent the formation of a placenta – which would result in vaccinated women essentially becoming infertile.” – Part of statement issued by German SPD parliamentarian and lung specialist Dr Wolfgang Wodarg, above and Dr Mike Yeadon.

FREUDIAN SLIP: Fact checkers Snopes ruled that the intervention from Dr Yeadon and Dr Wodarg claiming the mRNA vaccines from BioNTech/Pfizer would instruct the body to attack syncytin-1 which develops the placenta for pregnancies as false information but in the same breadth they acknowledge in flagging it that it can possibly happen.

TWO prominent scientists have called on European medical regulators to suspend all plans to roll out vaccines across the continent.

The former vice president of Pfizer and chief scientist for allergy and respiratory disease Dr Mike Yeadon along with German parliamentarian and lung specialist Dr Wolfgang Wodarg have filed an urgent application to the European Medicines Agency calling for an immediate suspension of all SARS-Cov2 vaccine studies, particularly the one linked to BioNTech/Pfizer which was given the green light by the National Health Service in the United Kingdom as the first country in Europe to roll out the vaccine.

Dr Mike Yeadon claims that this new Coronavirus vaccine contains a spike protein called syncytin-1 that is vital for the formation of human placenta in women.

This was revealed as two NHS staff developed an an ‘anaphylactoid reaction’ to the jab after its first day of roll out after having allergies to vaccines. Both staff were carrying epi-Pens and it is estimated in this article referring to this development, that up to seven million people in the country have some sort of allergy.

‘Spike proteins are essential in formation of placenta in mammals’

Dr Yeadon and Dr Wodarg allege that if the vaccine works so that it forms an immune response against syncytin-1, the body will be instructed to attack syncytin-1 which could theoretically lead to a period of infertility in women for an unspecified period.

Spike proteins such as these contain syncytin-homologous proteins which are essential in the formation of placenta in mammals, such as human beings.

They also allege that the mRNA vaccines from BioNTech/Pfizer contain polyethylene glycal (POG) of which 70 per cent of people develop antibodies against this substance and means that many people can develop allergic, potential fatal reactions to the vaccination.

Dr Yeadon is quoted on the website Global Research on the necessity of a vaccine of healthy people should not be proceed as it is not necessary to do this to people who are not at risk of disease. He is the former vice president of Pfizer and chief scientist for allergy and respiratory disease.

‘Don’t vaccinate people who are not at risk of disease’

“There is absolutely no need for vaccines to extinguish the pandemic. You do not vaccinate people who are not at risk of a disease. You also don’t set about planning to vaccinate millions of fit and healthy people with a vaccine that hasn’t been extensively tested on human subjects.”

The two doctors said in a joint statement: “Several vaccine candidates are expected to induce the formation of humoral antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2.

‘If vaccine attacks syncytin-1 antibodies it will sterilize women’

“There is no indication whether antibodies against spike proteins of SARS virus would also act like anti-syncytin-1 antibodies. However, if this were to be the case, this would then also prevent the formation of a placenta – which would result in vaccinated women essentially becoming infertile.”

Whilst some on here may be of the opinion that this is a conspiracy theory reading this and go along with the smears of mainstream media outlets discrediting those who are trying to reveal this information with their professional reputations at risk in doing so, check a statement by the trump card of fact checkers, Snopes.

‘Their claim about sterility through vaccine is possible, say Snopes’

In their attempt to discredit this information, they made a freudian slip, as seen above, where it says: “In the letter, Wodarg and Yeadon, that the Pfizer vaccine blocks a protein that is key in the formation of the placenta in mammals, and they claimed that it’s possible women who receive the vaccine could become infertile.”

If anyone is subsequently injured having taken the vaccine, the manufacturer will be indemnified from any attempt to bring civil proceedings for damages. and this was confirmed with a report in the Independent on 2 December.

‘This is genetic manipulation – don’t let them fool you’

The Disruptive Physician on Twitter said this: “Any vaccine that needs to be shipped and stored at -80’C isn’t a vaccine.

“It’s a transfection agent, kept alive so it can infect your cells and transfer genetic material. Don’t let them fool you.

“This is genetic manipulation of human on a massive scale. Shut it down.”

{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }

President Elect RossDeSuiza December 11, 2020 at 1:07 pm

To ascertain whether BNT162b2 might cause a problem with mammalian placenta formation one could test the vaccine in rabbit which has a gestation period of 31-33 days. There was plenty of time to run such testing in parallel with phase I/II/III human trials and yet an early decision was made TO DO NO ANIMAL TESTING.

WHY ?

Animal testing is cheap and quick and easily run in parallel with human trials. It is also STANDARD PROCEDURE with known useful efficacy in highlighting problem areas. Why exclude it ?

Was animal testing deliberately excluded because it would expose something that was required to be hidden ?

Or did they just get fed up of mass incineration of dead ferrets due to “unexpected results” in previous attempts to make a vaccine for a coronavirus ?

Thinking of refusing a Covid vaccine ? Wondering what to say when the Dr asks you “Why?” ? Simply reply “I am refusing this novel “experimental” vaccine because no appropriate animal testing has been undertaken.”

Reply

Ferret Jones December 11, 2020 at 7:52 pm

It’s not the first time that vaccines can cause these sort of issues.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X17308666

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: