‘No one should be discriminated against on their vaccination status’

February 17, 2021

GENERATION CLASH: “This is effectively creating a two-tier class of people in society – the vaccinated versus the unvaccinated and this will greatly impact young people. Imagine being a young person going through lockdown when you are not really effected by Coronavirus, having your job prospects slashed and not only that, not being able to participate in getting the economy moving again.” – Political commentator Dominique Samuels on Good Morning Britain.

CONFLICTING STATEMENTS: Mark Zuckerburg, CEO of Facebook, said in footage released by a whistleblower in his company: “I share some caution on this because we just don’t know the long-term side effects of basicallly modifying people’s RNA and DNA,” and contradicted this in a question and answer session with Dr Anthony Fauci on 30 November. Picture by Anthony Quintano.

 

 

 

A MAJOR tech owner has broken his own policy guidelines perceiving misinformation over medical interventions during the Covid-19 crisis.

James O’Keefe of Project Veritas received a video from a whistler blower inside Facebook which appears to show its founder Mark Zuckerburg saying he doesn’t know what the long-term side ramifications are for the recipients of the messenger RNA vaccines despite the platform’s “editorial policy” stipulating to simply question this is misinformation. If this is an actual stance, then Facebook is a publisher, not a social media platform.

We don’t know long term effects of altering people’s DNA – Mark Zuckerburg

In a clip from 16 July 2020, Zuckerburg said this: “I share some caution on this because we just don’t know the long-term side effects of basicallly modifying people’s RNA and DNA.”

However on 30 November on a public livestream question and answer session with Dr Anthony Fauci, the top health advisor in the US on the Covid-19 crisis, he said this: “My understanding is that this vaccines do not modify your DNA or RNA.”

‘Rules for thee but not for me’

Mr O’Keefe says as soon as Zuckerburg has made up his mind that this is the narrative to follow, he has denied making the July statement in direct contradiction of this second one in December and to not disclose this information or anyone to share this with any of the platform’s three billion followers. As Mr O’Keefe says, “Rules for thee but not for me.”

Back here in the UK this may be also relevant to any foreign readers of this post, there may be similar information that you can get hold about knowing your rights before any medical intervention is forced on you without informed consent and relates to France, but the same applies. The relevant document is put as as bullet point at the bottom of this article and is linked to the French Parliamentary assembly.

Threats of redundancy have already been made to public sector staff and manufacturing environments whereby if staff do not consent to PCR tests and then eventually vaccines, they will be at risk of losing their jobs. Critics have inferred that this is tantamount to medical tyranny.

There are two particular lines that strike out that you will be need to be aware of – the British equivalent needs to be found in UK law, so if somebody reading this can bring this to my attention I would be very grateful:

‘Documents lists rights on forced medical intervention’

⦁ 7.3.2 stipulates: “ensure that no one is discriminated against for not having been vaccinated, due to possible health risks or not wanting to be vaccinated;”


⦁ 7.3.1 says: “ensure that citizens are informed that the vaccination is NOT mandatory and that no one is politically, socially, or otherwise pressured to get themselves vaccinated, if they do not wish to do so themselves;


⦁ 7.3.3 reads: “take early effective measures to counter misinformation, disinformation and hesitancy regarding Covid-19 vaccines”


⦁ 7.3.4 reads: “distribute transparent information on the safety and possible side effects of vaccines, working with and regulating social media platforms to prevent the spread of misinformation.


⦁ 7.5.2 reads: “use vaccination certificates only for their designated purpose of monitoring vaccine efficacy, potential side-effects and adverse events


⦁ 7.4.1 reads: “ensure balance between the rapid development of vaccination for children and duly addressing safety and efficacy concerns and ensuring complete safety and efficacy of all vaccines made available to children, with a focus on the best interest of the child, in accordance with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child”

These four parts clearly show you cannot be discriminated against if you do not want to take the vaccine for ethical reasons but then the later clauses are being used in ways to justify censorship of material that questions the safety of the vaccines, particularly that of prominent voices who have had their reputations smeared for speaking out.

To add another chapter of misinformation given by the mainstream media or big tech corporations, please view this segment on vaccination passports given by Good Morning Britain featuring commentator Dominique Samuels and anchor presenter Kate Garraway, in which the 22-year-old pundit punches above her weight and comes out with her reputation enhanced.

‘Unvaccinated people will be the new underclass’

Ms Samuels said in the altercation: “This is effectively creating a two-tier class of people in society – the vaccinated versus the unvaccinated and this will greatly impact young people. Imagine being a young person going through lockdown when you not really effected by Coronavirus, having your job prospects slashed and not only that, not being able to participate in getting the economy moving again.

“Let’s be honest, the hospitality sector greatly relies on the custom of young people. The best thing we can do to get the economy moving again is to get the most vulnerable vaccinated and protected against coronavirus and ensure that businesses can open a Covid-safe environment.”

It is worth noting the mainstream news program disabled its comments section, and one only assume this was done because they were scared the majority of comments would not be supportive of Ms Garraway.

‘MSM outlets disable comments sections to avoid debate’

On a plethora of issues involving Black Lives Matter, the Covid-19 crisis, social distancing and lockdowns, many mainstream news organisations have disabled their comments sections or have approve them in advance before publishing, which is in effect censorship or calling glaring contradictions “hate speech”.

  • The French parliamentary document on rights and responsibilities is listed here.

{ 0 comments… add one now }

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: