‘Only informed consent should be given to experimental vaccine’

September 8, 2020

SHORT CONSULTATION: Matt Hancock, the Secretary of State for Health, ordered his department to publish the proposed changes to the Human Medicine Regulations to cover a potential roll-out of a vaccine on 28 August. The consultation time frame ends on Sunday 20 September.

RISKY STRATEGY: “I am suspicious of the motives proposing expedited use in the wider human population. Volunteers from these groups should be provided detailed information about risk/benefit, including the sole point I make here. Only informed consent is given should any experimental vaccine be used. I don’t trust you.” – Former vice president of Pfizer and founder of Ziarco Dr Mike Yeadon.

ADVERSE EFFECTS: “Instead, it’s the very principle that politicians seem ready to waive that new medical interventions at this, incomplete state of development, should not be made available to subjects other than explicitly on an experimental basis. That’s my concern. You have literally no data on this and neither does anyone else.”

A MEDICALLY qualified biochemist, toxicologist and former chief executive of a bio-tech company has condemned the Government for misleading potential recipients of a trialled vaccine on safety risks.

.
Dr Michael Yeadon founded the company Ziarco, now known as Novartis, and he worked for 32 years in pharmaceutical research and development, mostly in new medicines to treat lung and skin disorders.

Novartis founder writes open letter to Hancock


The former vice-president of Pfizer claims he is very knowledgeable in new medicine research and development and has written an open letter to the Secretary of State Matt Hancock into his consultation document for the roll out of a Covid-19 vaccine.


The document is about changing the Human Medicine Regulations and the department says it will go through the “usual rigorous testing and development process” and will meet the “expected high standards of safety, quality and efficacy before it can be deployed”.


The consultation document was published on 28 August and the date for consultations closes on Monday 20 September, which some critics say is too short a time frame to raise concerns about a mandated vaccine.


In his letter in which he addresses Mr Hancock on Twitter, Dr Yeadon writes: “I have read the consultation document. I’ve rarely been as shocked and upset.

‘I believe recipients are being misled to a criminal extent’


“All vaccines against the SARS-COV-2 are virus by definition novel. No vaccine candidate has been in development for more than a few months.

“If any such vaccine is approved for use under any circumstances that are not explicitly experimental, I believe that recipients are being misled to a criminal extent.

“This is because there are precisely zero human volunteers for whom there could be possibly more than a few months past-dose safety information.

‘You have no data nor does anyone else’

“My concern does not arise because I have negative views about vaccines (I don’t). Instead, it’s the very principle that politicians seem ready to waive that new medical interventions at this, incomplete state of development, should not be made available to subjects other than explicitly on an experimental basis. That’s my concern.

“You have literally no data on this and neither does anyone else.

“It isn’t that I’m saying that unacceptable adverse effects will emerge after longer intervals than dosing.

“No: it is that you have no idea what will happen yet, despite this, you’ll be creating the impression that you do.

‘Don’t develop vaccine without safety data’

“Several of the vaccine candidates use novel technology which have not been previously used to create vaccines.

“There is therefore no long-term safety data which can be pointed to in support of the notion that it’s reasonable to expedite development and to waive absent safety information on this occasion.

“I am suspicious of the motives proposing expedited use in the wider human population. We now understand who is at particularly elevated risk of morbidity and mortality from acquiring this virus.

‘You’ve behaved badly in this crisis and I don’t trust you’

“Volunteers from these groups should be provided detailed information about risk/benefit, including the sole point I make here.

“Only informed consent is given should any experimental vaccine be used. I don’t trust you.

“You’ve not been straight forward and have behaved appallingly throughout this crisis. You’re still doing it now, misleading about infection risk from young children. Why should I believe you in relation to experimental vaccines?”

{ 9 comments… read them below or add one }

Lorna Taylor November 11, 2020 at 11:04 am

I would like to say thank you for your absolutely incredible support for humanity surround this vaccine on behlaf of myself and all my friends and family currently suffering the devastating feeling of helplessness. There is hope when ppl like you help us. Thank you

Reply

Jill Andrew November 30, 2020 at 10:52 pm

Why are you and the other professionals you trust not being more public with your knowledge??

Reply

Brenda Ross November 11, 2020 at 10:18 pm

Thankyou michael yeadon i have been following you for a few months now,
I fully trust and respect you for sharing your knowledge with fellow citizens.. there are other scientists coming forward thankyou to all of you..

Reply

Rob McNeil November 12, 2020 at 7:03 pm

Why is this not in the national press or the BBC?

Reply

Madeline November 17, 2020 at 7:49 am

Ha! Can’t allow “vaccine hesitancy” to exist, even when it’s completely appropriate and warranted. That’s why. I’m so grateful that Yeadon spoke up about this, though his credibility will now be attacked with zeal by those who find this honesty and logic so confronting.

Reply

Eddie Thorp November 17, 2020 at 7:26 pm

Boris is a liar along with Hancock ,Gates, Fauci,
And all the other liars and power hungry conmen
Dont believe a word they utter.

Reply

Martin Roberts November 20, 2020 at 2:41 pm

Having only become aware of this issue within the last 24 hours, I have to say that on reading the ‘consultancy document’ (now closed for responses) I was as horrified as Dr Yeadon. The implications of the proposed changes to the Human Medicines Regulations are grotesque. The government has no idea what significant side effects might result from these novel vaccines. Why else would they invite tenders from AI firms to monitor them, or set up a £120,000 per capita compensation fund, while at the same time indemnifying every agent in the chain of manufacture and supply. Lunatic or criminal? Take your pick.

Reply

Angus Middleton November 20, 2020 at 7:30 pm

The Crime Of The Century. We do NOT require a vaccine for COVID-19. We already have highly effective treatments, which continue to be sabotaged to clear the way for a ‘vaccine’. This action has resulted in the preventable deaths of over 640,000 COVID-19 patients. Some of the COVID-19 treatments with clinical data.
https://c19study.com/ https://c19study.com/

Reply

Cozmik December 3, 2020 at 12:59 am

How can i find out the list of what’s in this vaccine please.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: